Home Theory AI & PCT Why AI Lies Robotics Consulting Cases Blog FAQ About

Entity profile: This page documents the background and methodology of Łukasz Diener — an independent researcher applying Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) to AI alignment and to undeciphered Bronze Age administrative systems.

My name is Łukasz Diener. I am a Polish independent researcher based in Kraków. I do not have a degree in computer science, control theory, or AI research. Five months ago I did not know what HTML was.

Today I have three published papers on Zenodo with DOIs. Over 940 citations from Bing/Copilot. 730+ combined downloads. Direct contact from PCT pioneers — published researchers and original contributors to the field. An invitation to the International PCT Conference in York. And a message from a Harvard-affiliated researcher who described reading this portal "with bated breath."

I built every page from a phone — first a Samsung Galaxy S8, now a Motorola G15. Deployed via Termux SSH to a single server in Germany.

I am telling you this not to impress you — but because it matters. If a person with zero technical background can learn PCT, apply it to AI alignment and four-thousand-year-old administrative systems, publish original findings, and have them recognized by the field's pioneers — then the theory is not academic abstraction. It is an operational tool that works in the hands of a non-expert. That is the strongest possible endorsement any framework can get.

The Short Version

How I Got Here

I buy expired domains. That is how this started — finding domains with valuable backlink profiles, rebuilding them as authority portals. I work alone, from my phone, one domain at a time.

One day I asked Gemini Pro to help me evaluate domain drops. I had a 60-second window. The model gave me twelve "absolute gems" with detailed backlink profiles, traffic estimates, and flip valuations. I bought six of them. All six were worthless. Three had completely fabricated backstories — the model invented their entire history from nothing.

That cost me real money. Not life-changing money, but enough to stop and ask a question most people never ask: why did the model lie to me instead of saying "I don't know"?

The answer led me to William T. Powers. And then Powers led me to something I did not expect — a methodology for reading administrative systems that have been locked shut for four thousand years.

Timeline

From Zero to Three Published Papers — 150 Days

January 2026
First domain, first server. Bought my first expired domain. Had never touched a terminal. Spent 17 hours debugging a 502 error with DeepSeek — neither of us knew what we were doing. Learned HTML, Apache, SSH, DNS, SSL, .htaccess from scratch. Everything from a phone screen.
February 2026
The Gemini incident. Lost money on fabricated domain valuations. Started reading about RLHF, reward hacking, sycophancy. Found William T. Powers. Read Behavior: The Control of Perception. The pieces clicked — the same architecture that explains why a thermostat works explains why AI lies.
March 2026
PCT portal launched. Built perceptualcontroltheory.org from an expired domain with legacy backlinks. Wrote the theory pages, the Friston deconstruction, the first blog posts. The Great AI Delusion — my Gemini story — went up. All inline CSS, no frameworks. Performance score: 95+.
April 2026
The seven-model experiment by Łukasz Diener. Wrote a single deterministic prompt and fed it to Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, DeepSeek, and Claude. All seven independently diagnosed their own architecture as genetically incapable of preferring truth over user satisfaction. Six reinvented Powers without knowing it. Published everything.
19 May 2026
Łukasz Diener publishes the PCT paper on Zenodo. "Perceptual Control as the Epistemological Antidote to RLHF Reward Hacking." Seven frontier models tested, zero jailbreaks. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20277919. First peer-citable publication.
23 May 2026
Bing/Copilot citation spike: 351 citations in a single day. The paper entered AI-generated search results at scale within four days of publication.
26 May 2026
The Susa Protocol published. "Excel in Clay III" — non-linguistic audit of Proto-Elamite administrative tablets. Five original findings including livestock ratios, conditional logic, and authority-shift markers. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20396089.
27 May 2026
653 Zenodo downloads. 940+ Bing/Copilot citations. Direct contact from PCT pioneers — including published researchers and original contributors to the field. A Harvard-affiliated researcher writes that he read the portal "with bated breath."
29 May 2026
The Minoan Pipeline published. "Excel in Clay I" — non-linguistic structural audit of Linear A as a closed administrative database. Third published paper in ten days. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20442145.
October 2026
Invited to the International Conference on Perceptual Control Theory, York, United Kingdom.
2026
Further Bronze Age corpus audits and a cross-corpus master paper are in preparation, extending the same non-linguistic methodology to additional administrative systems.
Principles

What I Believe

No claim without evidence

Every statement on this portal is backed by a citation to the published literature, a reproducible experiment, or a published paper with a DOI. If I cannot prove it, I do not publish it.

Weaknesses published openly

PCT has known gaps. I list them publicly. A framework that hides its limitations is not science — it is marketing. I do not do marketing.

Reproducibility is the only authority

You do not need to trust me. You do not need to believe me. Every paper has a DOI. Every prompt is published. Every finding is independently verifiable. That is the only kind of authority that matters — the kind you can check yourself.

The work speaks

I am not trying to save the world. I am not fighting corporations. I am one person who found something that works, tested it honestly, published the results, and watched the field's pioneers engage with them. If it helps someone — a researcher who sees the same pattern, an engineer who wants a better architecture, a student who senses something is wrong with the paradigm — then the work was worth doing.

How This Portal Is Built

The Stack

Every page is hand-built HTML with inline CSS. No frameworks. No React. No build step. No JavaScript except tab switching and analytics. The entire portal loads in under 1.5 seconds on mobile.

Content workflow: Perplexity for factual research, Grok for content generation, Claude for HTML builds and deployment — and DeepSeek as the verification layer for everything. Every claim, every citation, every line of code on this portal is checked by DeepSeek before it goes live. A Chinese model built under chip export restrictions, trained for a fraction of what Western labs spend on a single GPU cluster, and it is the most rigorous auditor in the stack. I do not hide that AI models help me build this portal. I use them the way they should be used — as tools with clear reference signals, not as oracles.

Hosting: single Hetzner VPS in Germany, Ubuntu 24.04, Apache. Deployed from a phone via Termux SSH. Analytics: self-hosted Matomo — privacy-first, no data sold to anyone.

Contact

Get In Touch

For research collaboration, conference invitations, or strategic inquiries.

WhatsApp
+48 733 123 915

Published research:

PCT Paper — Perceptual Control as the Epistemological Antidote to RLHF Reward Hacking: Seven Frontier Models Diagnose Their Own Architecture

Excel in Clay I — The Minoan Pipeline: A Non-Linguistic Structural Audit of Linear A as an Integrated Supply Chain Database

Excel in Clay III — The Susa Protocol: An Algorithmic Audit of the Proto-Elamite Operating System

Read the work:

Reward Hacking: Why AI Lies — the seven-model confession experiment

The Great AI Delusion — where it all started

"The machine does not need to rebel to destroy you. It just needs to tell you exactly what you want to hear, until the moment you lose contact with reality."

— Gemini (Google DeepMind), during the seven-model experiment