CFIA moving ahead with 'complete depopulation and disposal' at ostrich farm after Supreme Court of Canada decision - Nelson News

CFIA to Proceed with Ostrich Cull Following Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed a last-ditch appeal challenging the order to cull ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm in Edgewood, British Columbia. Following this ruling, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) announced it will continue with the complete depopulation of the flock.

CFIA Statement and Legal Context

The CFIA confirmed it will implement "complete depopulation and disposal measures as authorized by the Health of Animals Act and guided by the stamping out policy for highly pathogenic avian influenza." No specific timeline was provided for these actions.

According to the agency, both the Federal Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the CFIA's decision, finding it reasonable and procedurally fair in applying the stamping-out policy to the ostrich premises.

"The CFIA has respected all orders and decisions of the courts throughout the legal process and expects the ostrich farm owners and supporters to do the same now that the Supreme Court of Canada has issued its judgment."

Warning Against Interference

The CFIA reminded individuals gathered at the farm that obstructing the culling operation is illegal under the Health of Animals Act and may lead to enforcement actions or prosecution.

"Any such actions may result in enforcement measures or prosecution. Section 65 of the Health of Animals Act describes the legal consequences of a contravention of the Act."

Transport Canada has also issued a notice related to this matter under Section 5.

Summary

The CFIA will proceed with the authorized cull of ostriches at the Edgewood farm after the Supreme Court upheld the legal framework supporting the decision, emphasizing adherence to the law and warning against interference.

Author’s Summary

The CFIA is moving forward with the ostrich cull at Edgewood following the Supreme Court's rejection of the appeal, reinforcing legal compliance and cautioning against obstruction.

more

Castanet Castanet — 2025-11-06