The Democratic Party’s leadership appears driven more by fear than principle, argues Chris Roemer. Shortly after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, actress Jamie Lee Curtis appeared on the left-leaning podcast WTF with Marc Maron. During the episode, Curtis committed what many on the left deemed an unforgivable act: expressing sympathy for Kirk and his family.
“I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say, but I believe he was a man of faith, and I hope in that moment when he died, that he felt connected to his faith, even though his ideas were abhorrent to me.”
“I still believe he’s a father and a husband and a man of faith, and I hope whatever connection to God means that he felt it.”
Showing sympathy to someone who holds non-secular views on LGBTQIA+ issues sparked outrage among many on the left. The backlash was so severe that Curtis felt obligated to clarify her remarks in an interview with Variety:
“An excerpt of it mistranslated what I was saying as I wished him well — like I was talking about him in a very positive way, which I wasn’t; I was simply talking about his faith in God.”
Curtis’ need to qualify her compassion highlights the intolerance within certain left-wing circles, where expressing empathy for political opponents is increasingly unacceptable.
Author’s summary: Roemer criticizes the Democratic leadership for intolerance, emphasizing the damaging effects of demanding political purity and rejecting basic empathy for ideological opponents.