David Kampf’s Contract Situation
Can anyone really fault David Kampf for signing a four-year deal that averages $2.4 million per season to play hockey? It’s hard to blame him for securing his financial future with such terms.
Limited No-Trade Clause
Is it fair to criticize Kampf for negotiating a limited no-trade clause as part of his contract? This kind of provision is common and gives players some control over their careers.
"Can anyone blame David Kampf for signing a four year deal that will see him on average earn $2.4M a season to play hockey?"
"Is it in any way David Kampf’s fault for somehow managing to also pick up a limited no trade clause in the process?"
Summary
David Kampf’s decision to accept a steady contract with control over potential trades reflects a smart approach to ensuring stability in his hockey career.
Would you like the tone to be more neutral or slightly opinionated?