Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is a Better Bowler in All Formats?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning performance in the 2nd T20I against India at the MCG, raising the question of whether he is a better bowler than Jasprit Bumrah.
Hazlewood's Impact in the 2nd T20I
Hazlewood was almost unplayable during the match, especially with the new ball. He dismantled the Indian top order, taking 3 wickets for 13 runs in his four overs. His victims included Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma.
This exceptional bowling spell was crucial, leading to India being bowled out for just 125 runs.
Bumrah’s Performance in the Same Match
India looked to their star pacer, Jasprit Bumrah, to contain the Australian batsmen and guide the chase. However, Bumrah started off with a few expensive deliveries, easing the Australian pursuit.
He ended with 2 wickets for 26 runs, but those wickets had little impact on the outcome.
Comparing Their Careers Across Formats
While Hazlewood’s recent form was impressive, Jasprit Bumrah remains the more effective bowler overall. Bumrah boasts better averages and strike rates across all formats, cementing his status as one of the best pacers in contemporary cricket.
"Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket."
Yet, the latest performances highlight Hazlewood as a formidable competitor in all formats.
Would you like a version with more detailed statistics included?